查看完整版本: The Internet Thinks Chris Wallace Was the Real Winner of the Presidential Debate

The Internet Thinks Chris Wallace Was the Real Winner of the Presidential Debate

:lol :lol :lol

我觉得Wallace应该是四次debate moderators中最能镇得住场的，最能把握住节奏的一个了，也可能因为有前面三场可以参考吧。
我记得第一场是NBC Lester Holt，整个乱了，貌似他对Trump的毁灭力没什么准备，呵呵

表演结束了，看11月8日的实况直播吧~

Trump说他要给大家减税，大大地减！Too good to be true~ 我真心希望能减税，赋税也太高了，辛苦挣下的每一分钱都在缴税，上周拿到所申请的专利award，一看，砍掉1/3税:Q

可是，Trump这么不靠谱的人，我觉得他说的话都不能当真。

Hillary说要对富人加税，我不是富人，我希望能对我们不是富人的工薪阶层减税，不要设神马25万这个线好不好，把线设高一些好不好？

俩人谁上台，貌似我们民工的税都不会少缴，能不再多缴就谢天谢地了！！！

The word is now the top-trending search on Google: Bigly

Republican nominee Donald Trump is known for some unusual speech patterns.

During the third and final presidential debate, Trump used one of his favorite words, "bigly."

The comment came during a contentious discussion of President Barack Obama's immigration record, where Trump asserted that Obama had deported "millions" of people.

"He doesn't want to say that, but that's what's happened... bigly," Trump said.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, bigly is actually a word meaning "with great force."

[[i] 本帖最后由 pp_dream 于 2016-10-20 23:34 编辑 [/i]]

#bigly

However, after the first presidential debate, Eric Trump, the nominee's son, told The Hollywood Reporter that the Republican nominee had said "big league," and not "bigly."

:lol

真欢乐

这次大选，我学会了好几个以前不知道的单词，词汇量在增加~~~
好吧，多选几次，我会进步得更快滴:lol

bad hombres

Hombre, the Spanish word for “man,” which in English is often used in a slightly more informal fashion to refer to a “guy” or “fellow,” spiked 120,000% over the hourly average after Donald Trump used the word in the final presidential debate.

上课啦

(RNN) - No matter which candidate you support, this presidential campaign has had several "unproud" moments.

Republican candidate Donald Trump used that word in Sunday night's second presidential debate to describe how he was "not unproud" of a series of early morning tweets he sent disparaging a former Miss Universe.

It was among a list of words that Dictionary.com says trended in searches during the debate.

The site does not have a definition for "unproud" but Merriam-Webster defines it as "modest or meek."

Trump also used "not proud" in the debate describing the release of a recording of him saying sexually charged things about his approach toward women.

That's not the only word without a definition that trended, either. "Bigly" has been a favorite of Trump during the campaign, and he used it again Sunday. It also has not been defined.

Many of the other trending words were related to policy issues like "amnesty," "block grant," "demagogic" and "xenophobia."

"Deplorable" is another that made the list because of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. She had referred to half of Trump's supporters as belonging in a "basket of deplorables" earlier in the campaign. The site defines deplorable as meaning "causing or being subject for censure, reproach or disapproval; wretched; very bad."

Ironically, "bad" is a word Dictionary.com tracked because of its frequent use in the debate. It was uttered 16 times, all by Trump. He used it to describe judgment nine times, Obamacare and "things" two times each and people, leaders and deal one time each.

The analysis also showed Trump used about 30 more words per response than Clinton. She averaged 168 words per answer to his 196.

But words weren't the only thing the online lexicographers tracked.

Trump used 12 one-word sentences to Clinton's three, asked 41 rhetorical questions while speaking to Clinton's eight and interrupted other speakers twice as often.

A total of 18 interruptions were committed by Trump. He interrupted Clinton six times, moderator Anderson Cooper seven times and moderator Martha Raddatz five times.

Clinton interrupted Trump three times, Raddatz four times and Cooper twice.

Trump complained multiple times during the debate about the frequency with which the moderators interrupted him compared to Clinton, at one point claiming it was "one on three." Dictionary.com counted moderator interruptions at 11 for Trump and seven for Clinton.

Raddatz interrupted both candidates four times. Cooper interrupted Trump seven times and Clinton three times.

Here is a full list of all the trending words from the debate, in alphabetic order:

acid-washed
Aleppo
amnesty
bigly
block grant
debunk/debunked
decisiveness
demagogic
denigrate
deplorable
nuclear
osmosis
prisoner of war/POW
rejigger, jigger, jiggering
secretively
unproud
veto
xenophobia, xenophobic, and xenophobe

跟我女儿说起bigly，我们俩都忍不住地笑半天，我想着Trump说bigly的样子，更是觉得可乐。

bigly， 让我再笑会儿:lol :lol :lol

最近几天几个州都在early vote。看电视报道，简直要吓死人了
Trump支持者说，如果Trump输了大选，那将意味着内战！:funk:
Hillary支持者说，如果Trump赢了大选，America will see Blood in the streets:funk:

这是要闹哪样啊:funk:

我们同学的微信群这几天简直就要打起来了，说不了几句话，气氛就火药味十足的。看起来是川粉和希粉各占一半。其实，同学们大都在加州，歪，在加州的人需要选嘛？反正怎么选都是蓝色的，呵呵。

发现华裔老中川粉特别多，不光多，他们发表的檄文，怎么读都觉着文章还透着文革气味，真糟糕:Q

在公司大家只在吃饭时偶尔聊聊，大多数同事都是消极派，也有有明显支持倾向的。有天吃饭时聊起来，没说几句就有点气氛不对了，我们group活宝Keith跟我说，嗨，再过一分钟，你去抱住XXX， 我去抱住YYY，要不然他们要打起来的。哈哈~

在公司，一般有默认的规矩，不谈政治和宗教。但因为我们大家很熟，所以还是会聊，可这次有些气氛不一样，尤其是离大选结束越近，大家越不谈大选了。

我没选票，我是观望者，一身轻松看热闹:lol

完了完了，我们同学圈吵崩了，大家谁也不理谁了，呵呵。

我同学里有几个牛人真的很牛，比如在FDA工作的科学家刘同学，他专业是化学类的。在争吵中，刘同学只使用英文辩论，那英文地道的，完全看不出是2nd language。

还有秀同学，在范德堡教育系做教授，比刘同学更牛。不过她是文科专业，牛是应该的；刘同学是化学生物类专业，语言这么厉害让我吓一跳，呵呵。

还有位在扭腰做建筑师的雁同学，旁引博证，中英文一起上。

再有位在弯曲做码农的莽同学和在南加做码农的微微同学，观点完全不一样，各自分别从专业角度分析大选中投票是否作弊，等等。

同学中牛人真不少，正因如此，大家吵崩啦！:lol

回复 14楼pp_dream 的帖子

我和其他几个同学纯属吃瓜看热闹并受教育的:lol

上旺旺有一年半载啦，论岁月估计不相上下，其它我望尘莫及，喜欢你的资信分享；在这里每次好像很急切的看到你的文字，能看到不一样的真实的外面世界。谢谢！

5 tips for right now if you're super-stressed by Trump vs. Clinton

It's not 1860, when the election actually did shatter the country. It's not 1968 when the country once again was falling apart.

It's not even 1980, when interest rates were double-digits, Iran held American hostages and a former movie star was on the ballot.

But there's still — or just — two weeks left in Trump vs. Clinton.

No matter who you support for president, the 2016 race is stressing out a majority of those polled, according to the American Psychological Association.

The subset of the "Stress in America" survey released earlier this month finds that 52 percent of those asked say they are very or somewhat stressed by the race for president between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton.

So, what can you do? The organization suggests:

1. Turning it off
"Limit your media consumption. Read just enough to stay informed. Turn off the newsfeed or take a digital break. Take some time for yourself, go for a walk, or spend time with friends and family doing things that you enjoy."


2. Quieting the conflict
"Avoid getting into discussions about the election if you think they have the potential to escalate to conflict. Be cognizant of the frequency with which you're discussing the election with friends, family members or co-workers."


3. Doing something else

"Stress and anxiety about what might happen is not productive. Channel your concerns to make a positive difference on issues you care about. Consider volunteering in your community, advocating for an issue you support or joining a local group. Remember that in addition to the presidential election, there are state and local elections taking place in many parts of the country, providing more opportunities for civic involvement."


4. Trusting history

"Whatever happens on Nov. 8, life will go on. Our political system and the three branches of government mean that we can expect a significant degree of stability immediately after a major transition of government. Avoid catastrophizing, and maintain a balanced perspective."


5. Realizing your vote matters

"Vote. In a democracy, a citizen's voice does matter. By voting, you will hopefully feel you are taking a proactive step and participating in what for many has been a stressful election cycle. Find balanced information to learn about all the candidates and issues on your ballot (not just the presidential races), make informed decisions and wear your 'I voted' sticker with pride."
The stress, apparently, doesn't discriminate by time zone or political affiliation.

"We're seeing that it doesn't matter whether you're registered as a Democrat or Republican — U.S. adults say they are experiencing significant stress from the current election," said Lynn Bufka, the group's associate executive director for practice research and policy.


And it's not just TV coverage. Four in 10 report that their blood pressure is rising from discussions about the election on social media, the group says.

"Election stress becomes exacerbated by arguments, stories, images and video on social media that can heighten concern and frustration, particularly with thousands of comments that can range from factual to hostile or even inflammatory," Bufka said.

Chris Borick, a Muhlenberg College political science professor and head of the college's Institute of Public Opinion, says while there have been elections in more difficult times, this one is unique on the panic meter.

The stress is measurable both in polling data and in speaking with voters, he said.

"More people come up saying how much this election bothers them," he said. "It's literally keeping them up at night, causing them incredible levels of discomfort. I'm a political scientist and a pollster. Sometimes I feel like therapist. Personally I've never seen anything like this."

With almost two in three people polled saying they don't like Trump and more than 50 percent with a similar dislike of Clinton, stress is no surprise, Borick said.

"Ninety percent (of people polled) say they are concerned" about the election, Borick said. "... Polls show that Americans are worried about the direction of the country, and you layer in two unpopular candidates and it causes a large degree of tension and anxiety among the electorate."

Borick, as with most people, is inundated with politics due to its constant availability on TV, in print and across social media.

"It is everywhere. It's hard to avoid," he said. "The level of information and delivery systems are undoubtedly contributing to the overall stress."

For at least one party affiliation, the hoped-for outcome by Nov. 9 will end the sleepless nights, he said.

"For lots of Americans, there's going to be relief because their preferred candidate won the election," Borick said. "The option perhaps they most fear is removed from the equation."

That doesn't necessarily mean it will be over for everybody. But without an issue such as slavery on the table, the election should have an expiration date, Borick said.

"As much as people right now are totally invested in not seeing an outcome they are afraid of, I don't think the country will be interested in continuing the campaigns on Nov. 9," he said.